The New Covenant Promises We Already Possess (2 Corinthians 7:1)
Paul's 'since we have these promises' in 2 Cor. 7:1 shows the church already holds New Covenant blessings—presence, covenant, adoption.
Articles tagged with “Inaugurated Eschatology”
Paul's 'since we have these promises' in 2 Cor. 7:1 shows the church already holds New Covenant blessings—presence, covenant, adoption.
A Progressive Dispensationalist critique of the classical view that Matthew 13 describes a mixed Christendom, showing the field is the world, not the church.
Peter and James both answer crises by citing fulfilled prophecy—not mere analogy. Why Acts 2 and Acts 15 demand partial fulfillment, the key insight of Progressive Dispensationalism.
Traditional dispensationalists already accept 'already / not yet' in Luke 4, Zech. 9, and Dan. 9. Nine biblical examples show that phased fulfillment is not a PD invention.
Psalm 110 and 1 Cor 15:25 show Christ reigns now from God's right hand — a cornerstone of Progressive Dispensationalism's inaugurated eschatology.
Four grammatical problems with the futurist interpretation of Matthew 13 in dispensationalism, showing why the Kingdom cannot be entirely absent from the present age.
Does McClain's Kingdom theology contain an internal contradiction? Two of his own premises imply a present Kingdom — and progressive dispensationalism resolves the tension.
Is 'partial fulfillment' an oxymoron in English? Corpus evidence from dissertations, contracts, and dictionaries shows the phrase is standard Anglophone usage.
Hebrews 9–10 inseparably links the church's present blessings to the New Covenant. A critique of the SCIO position of Cone and Beacham.
C.I. Scofield affirmed a partial, continuous fulfillment of Joel 2 from the first advent onward. The 1967 New Scofield revision committee quietly replaced that view with a strict analogy-only reading.
James cites Amos in Acts 15 to prove Gentiles enter as Gentiles—not analogy but staged fulfillment. A Progressive Dispensationalism reading.
Five OT texts prove canonical writers used 'fulfilled' before final consummation, exposing the all-or-nothing rule of traditional dispensationalism.
A survey showing that many traditional dispensationalists affirm the same partial/inaugurated fulfillment of Joel 2 in Acts 2 that progressive dispensationalists do—they simply use different vocabulary.
A Progressive Dispensationalist reading of Acts 1:6 arguing that the text does not support total postponement of the Messianic Kingdom, only the deferral of its national-Israelite dimension.
Notes on unexpected positions in JBTS Issue 9: a TD (Dunham) embracing inaugurated eschatology and citing Ladd, a PD (Vlach) rejecting complementary hermeneutics, and two TDs (Fazio and Snoeberger) on opposite sides of sensus plenior.